JackT wrote:I am?
Yup.
tonywojo wrote:Jesus Jack, I know I'm supposed to be cryptic but your 'something for me' post refers.
As it happens all Guardian readers talk nonsense.
You forgot Drudge. Your one-stop shop for reactionary conservatism.black francis wrote:Yeah it's Fox News, MichelleMalkin.com and AnnCoulter.com for Jack. The Guardian, Pah!
black francis wrote:And what bashing goes on here is usally in a playful and loving manner.
Frank The Bunny wrote:I completely agree with Octavia on her opinion.
I'm actually wondering why Peter didn't name the homepage something like "index.htm" or "index.html"
That seems to be the tradition.
As for this thread - it's at 141 posts.
By my quick glance, that's #2 for this whole forum, behind "Does anyone care about Echo & The Bunnymen anymore"
There's a reason this thread's now at 10 pages.
Sure there's a lot of the usual silliness interspersed, but the topic at hand (censorship) is important. And if I'm not mistaken, it's one of the reasons Brian opened this forum in the first place.
tonywojo wrote:Jesus Jack, I know I'm supposed to be cryptic but your 'something for me' post refers.
As it happens all Guardian readers talk nonsense.
kook wrote:Oh, and I thought you just wrote a lot of incomprehensible drivel!Cryptic, is it? Now I'll have to go back and read all that twaddle again to decipher the layered linguistic gymnastics.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests