Songwriting credits on meteorites ...

by **Dave Smith** » Wed Mar 05, 2014 6:44 am

Is it really just Mac with Will being paid MU rates?????????

by **fat cherry** » Wed Mar 05, 2014 7:23 am

he might be the one in proftit. unless theres a world cup anthem on there.....

by **fat cherry** » Wed Mar 05, 2014 7:24 am

where'd you hear that anyways?

by **King Of Kings** » Wed Mar 05, 2014 1:07 pm

Will

Only guest on some othe songs

by **Dave Smith** » Wed Mar 05, 2014 1:19 pm

mu bit is a joke but the press releases say Mac songs .....if that is the case then Wills cut will be mediocre

by **Sick4Tunz** » Thu Mar 06, 2014 11:15 pm

A marriage of convenience. How unfortunate when such talent is ignored.

by **Mr.Sparkle** » Fri Mar 07, 2014 4:00 am

I think it's pretty clear that Will isn't really into the band anymore except for the money.

Unrelated but does the album cover look like a bunch of chewed up gum? Maybe that's what it is.

by **bluegrace** » Fri Mar 07, 2014 10:56 am

Don't like the album cover at all...

by **meh** » Sat Mar 08, 2014 11:03 am

Mr.Sparkle wrote:I think it's pretty clear that Will isn't really into the band anymore except for the money.

Unrelated but does the album cover look like a bunch of chewed up gum? Maybe that's what it is.

isn't that the same for both of them? but atleast they're releasing new albums and not living off their glory years still like many many bands

by **Mr.Sparkle** » Mon Mar 10, 2014 12:27 am

meh wrote:isn't that the same for both of them? but atleast they're releasing new albums and not living off their glory years still like many many bands

Their live shows are mostly the same greatest hits list over and over again. I don't want to judge their motivations for continuing the band, if it's for money it's for money, I just wish the music they were putting out was better. It'd also be cool if both remaining members had equal input.

by **Mr. Brian** » Mon Mar 10, 2014 7:50 am

Mr.Sparkle wrote:Their live shows are mostly the same greatest hits list over and over again. I don't want to judge their motivations for continuing the band, if it's for money it's for money, I just wish the music they were putting out was better. It'd also be cool if both remaining members had equal input.

I think they should follow the Psychedelic Furs model and tour like crazy with little or no new material being released. No one is buying tickets to hear the new material and people are not exactly lining up to buy the new albums either. It's just been the law of diminishing reruns since Evergreen hasn't it? Let Mac do the new stuff under his name only and release it via Pledge. I just feel all this watered down stuff is a black eye on the bands real and great legacy.

I fear a Fountain II here. However, I really want to be wrong about this.

by **Kounelaki** » Mon Mar 10, 2014 1:07 pm

Mr. Brian wrote:I fear a Fountain II here. However, I really want to be wrong about this.

Sadly, I think you are right.

by **Mr.Sparkle** » Mon Mar 10, 2014 9:18 pm

Mr. Brian wrote:I think they should follow the Psychedelic Furs model and tour like crazy with little or no new material being released. No one is buying tickets to hear the new material and people are not exactly lining up to buy the new albums either. It's just been the law of diminishing reruns since Evergreen hasn't it? Let Mac do the new stuff under his name only and release it via Pledge. I just feel all this watered down stuff is a black eye on the bands real and great legacy.

I fear a Fountain II here. However, I really want to be wrong about this.

I agree, simply for monetary reasons he won't release this under his name. I think the Bunnymen's legacy and reputation with the first four albums is still untouched in relation to the newer material simply because a lot of people haven't heard the new stuff or don't care, not to mention it's not really the same band. But I think if they keep releasing mediocre dad rock and it piles up that might change. It's hard to tell at this point.

I've said it before though, I don't understand why they just don't try some more experimental stuff if they are going to keep recording music, it's not like there is anything to lose and you know Will would be up for it.

by **meh** » Thu Mar 13, 2014 7:15 am

Mr.Sparkle wrote:Their live shows are mostly the same greatest hits list over and over again. I don't want to judge their motivations for continuing the band, if it's for money it's for money, I just wish the music they were putting out was better. It'd also be cool if both remaining members had equal input.

are we talking about the stones? :wink:

by **Mr.Sparkle** » Thu Mar 13, 2014 4:18 pm

meh wrote:are we talking about the stones?

Might as well be, Mac in another 20 years, not sure that's a pretty picture.

Songwriting credits on meteorites ...

Songwriting credits on meteorites ...

Who is online