In The Margins wrote:That's insulting.
No, it is funny. Laugh.
Frank The Bunny wrote:I'm sorry. I didn't mean to insult you.
I think the real insult is to the Americans who are swallowing the shit she's been spewing - the lies about her own record, the lies about Obama's record. To be fair, it was all written for her.
insanejane wrote:And here they are contradicting themselves. The double standard:
http://blueollie.wordpress.com/2008/09/ ... -karl-rove
Taken from http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/09/ ... 4049.shtml
Palin: "But listening to him speak, it's easy to forget that this is a man who has authored two memoirs but not a single major law or reform - not even in the state senate."
Palin: "America needs more energy ... our opponent is against producing it."
No -- he plans to develop a lot more energy than John McCain does. It's just that a lot of it is renewable, not carbon-based. Moreover, Obama hasn't skipped the last eight votes on renewable energy.
Palin: "The Democratic nominee for president supports plans to raise income taxes ... raise payroll taxes ... raise investment income taxes ... raise the death tax ... raise business taxes ... and increase the tax burden on the American people by hundreds of billions of dollars. My sister Heather and her husband have just built a service station that's now opened for business - like millions of others who run small businesses. How are they going to be any better off if taxes go up?"
THE FACTS: The Tax Policy Center, a think tank run jointly by the Brookings Institution and the Urban Institute, concluded that Obama's plan would increase after-tax income for middle-income taxpayers by about 5 percent by 2012, or nearly 2,200 dollars annually. McCain's plan, which cuts taxes across all income levels, would raise after tax-income for middle-income taxpayers by 3 percent, the center concluded.
JackT wrote:So, if it turns out you were wrong about these lies, does this make you a liar? Perhaps we should just say that you have a political point of view which you want to promote in the strongest possible terms while highlighting the weaknesses of opposing points of view in the least flattering way possible.
Frank The Bunny wrote:Sure. Call me a liar if you want, when that time comes. (I've been called much worse - trust me)
I do have a point of view, and you and I both have done a good job of supporting our respective beliefs in this forum. I don't believe any candidate is a saint. Nobody gets to Washington without comprimising his/her integrity to one degree or another.
I do find it interesting that McCain the candidate seems to have taken a back seat to his running mate. Until she opens her mouth on the issues, it's her election to win, not his.
JackT wrote:Yes, it seems a lot of the conservative faithful want Palin to be President.
It is a little ironic, but maybe just human nature, that people who were decrying the savior/"chosen one" mentality of Obama supporters are very eager to have exactly that same experience with Palin. The less we know about someone, the easier it is to project our hopes onto them. These kinds of situations usually end in disappointment.
insanejane wrote:but would you ( the Republican party) want her to be President if she wasn't "hot" ? Probably not.
Frank The Bunny wrote:I agree. If she were more "manly" (like Hillary), she'd be less appealing.
In the words of Rush Limbaugh: "Babies, guns & Jesus! Hot Damn!"
JackT wrote:As evidence, the Democrats passed over the "manly" Hillary in favor of an attractive, male neophyte. No doubt Obama's appearance has a significant bearing on his appeal.
Frank The Bunny wrote:I'm sorry. I didn't mean to insult you.
I think the real insult is to the Americans who are swallowing the shit she's been spewing - the lies about her own record, the lies about Obama's record. To be fair, it was all written for her.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests