zabird wrote:as to smallest ... no idea. Weren't those Boston and NY gigs at smallish places? Likewise the places they played during SXSW in Austin. personally, I like seeing favorite bands at very small venues.
DivaDiana77 wrote:So, anyone actually going? It's looking like I will. :)
Sick4Tunz wrote:I debating going. I'm more drawn to climbing Mt. Whitney before the show. I'm waiting to see if they'll announce resuming their cancelled North American tour. I'd much rather see them in a smaller venue where the audience has come specifically for them. But then I'd miss out on an opportunity to kill myself in an avalanche on the Mountineers Route.
Sick4Tunz wrote:I debating going. I'm more drawn to climbing Mt. Whitney before the show. I'm waiting to see if they'll announce resuming their cancelled North American tour. I'd much rather see them in a smaller venue where the audience has come specifically for them. But then I'd miss out on an opportunity to kill myself in an avalanche on the Mountineers Route.
In The Margins wrote:The Boston and NYC venues both hold about 250. I think one of the Austin venues during SXSW may be hold less than that, but I don't know for sure.
black francis wrote:Of course the missus had her tubes tied
black francis wrote:Hey death on a mountain was good enough for George Mallory and Andrew Irvine. And should you be killed in a heroic ascent I will name my next child after you just like I named my first two after Mallory and Irvine.
Of course the missus had her tubes tied so it would have to be adoption or a love child.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests