The Godlike Genius of Radiohead.

by **kook** » Tue Dec 15, 2009 5:35 pm

Do you mean 'tache'?

If so, I think you'll find that comes under 'cheesy perviness', which is allowed in the best circles.

by **Dr Evil** » Wed Dec 16, 2009 8:42 am

(publicity= good videos-bad videos)

Mac (young version)
looks 10
dance 10
voice 10
songwriting 10
band 10
intellectual depth 10

Mac (old version)
looks -10
dance -10
voice -12
songwriting -10
band 5
intellectual depth -10

Thom

looks -10
dance -0
songwriting 10
voice 10
band 10
intellectual depth 10
publicity 10

Karen O

looks 10
dance 10
songwriting 8
voice 9
band 7
intellectual depth 8
publicity 8

Someone only Tomo is about to find out about (DVD in the post)

looks 11
dance 0
songwriting 11
voice 11
band 11
intellectual depth 11
publicity -11

by **Frank The Bunny** » Wed Dec 16, 2009 10:31 am

I like Radiohead better when they were a rock band - everything after OK Computer is just weird, mastubatory...and complete shit.

by **JackT** » Wed Dec 16, 2009 1:16 pm

Frank The Bunny wrote:I like Radiohead better when they were a rock band - everything after OK Computer is just weird, mastubatory...and complete shit.

The only Radiohead album I own, or have listened to, is The Bends. I like it, though.

by **black francis** » Wed Dec 16, 2009 7:34 pm

The Bends is still my favorite followed by OK Computer but Frank is right about their stuff after. A little too avante garde for my simple tastes.

by **tonywojo** » Thu Dec 17, 2009 5:06 pm

kook wrote:Wot 'e said

Jesus, Wojo, that'll be a first!

u saying im bipolar?

by **tonywojo** » Thu Dec 17, 2009 5:07 pm

JackT wrote:The only Radiohead album I own, or have listened to, is The Bends. I like it, though.

agreed ftb moreso than most bit like the cure

by **fat cherry** » Mon Dec 21, 2009 5:58 am

pablo honey. haven't played it since about, oo er a long time. Probably not even this century.

This is why he gets on my nerves more than his whiney little voice:
http://www.nme.com/news/radiohead/48941

and they even published my comment, woo hoo I'm famous - 10 points if you can spot my new online identity!!!!! Or not.

by **Kounelaki** » Fri Jan 01, 2010 9:14 am

2009: The Year Everyone Turned on Radiohead
http://exclaim.ca/articles/generalartic ... fid1=43388

by **tonywojo** » Fri Jan 01, 2010 9:22 am

Kounelaki wrote:2009: The Year Everyone Turned on Radiohead
http://exclaim.ca/articles/generalartic ... fid1=43388

They never turned me on.

by **withahip** » Sun Jan 03, 2010 9:44 am

by **tonywojo** » Sun Jan 03, 2010 10:12 am

withahip wrote:

how can u like a band when the lead singer looks like this?

he could at least wear dark glasses

by **Frank The Bunny** » Sun Jan 03, 2010 10:40 am

Dark glasses he needs not if believe in the Force he does.

by **Dr Evil** » Sun Jan 03, 2010 11:00 am

Music isn't a beauty contest. Ask Susan Boyle or Alison Moyet. Though being a looker does help get the music across, Mac is quoted as saying he had a great face for what he was trying to do. It reflected the beauty of his voice. Now everything seems about covering up both these missing assets.

by **withahip** » Sun Jan 03, 2010 2:58 pm

Dr Evil wrote:Music isn't a beauty contest. Ask Susan Boyle or Alison Moyet. Though being a looker does help get the music across, Mac is quoted as saying he had a great face for what he was trying to do. It reflected the beauty of his voice. Now everything seems about covering up both these missing assets.

The Godlike Genius of Radiohead.

Who is online