Favorite album in order

[King Of Kings]

1) Heaven up Here
2) Crocodiles
3) Porcupine
4) Burned
5) Ocean Rain
6) Reverberation
7) Evergreen
8) Grey
9) Siberia
10) Flowers
11) WYGTDWYL
12) Fountain

1. Candland
2. Slidling
3. Curvature of The Earth
4. Mystero
5. Performance
6. Themes for the Grind

[avalancheofecho]

1.Crocodiles
2.Ocean Rain
3.Heaven up here
4.Porcupine
5.Burned
6.Evergreen
7.Flowers
8.Echo & The Bunnymen
9.Siberia
10.WYGTDWYL
11.The Fountain

1.Mysterio
2.Candleland
3.Slidling

Live/Bootlegs

1.Never stop:Live in liverpool
2.Fillmore San Francisco 12/5/05
3.Ocean Rain 25th anniversary edition Live Albert Hall
4.London, improv theater April 1, 1999: Echo and the birthday man
5.Glastonbury 97
6.Ocean Rain live 2008
7.Kilburn 97

[black francis]

1. Crocodiles
2. Porcupine
3. Ocean Rain
4. Heaven Up Here
5. Siberia
6. Echo & the Bunnymen
7. Evergreen
8. What Are You Going to Do With Your Life?
9. The Fountain
10. Flowers
11. Reverberation

[withahip]

Heaven Up Here
Porcupine
Crocodiles
Ocean Rain
EATB
Evergreen

[Dr Evil]

(1) Reverberation
(2) Heaven Up Here
(3) the rest...

[Mr. Brian]

Sorry I can't rate the last 5 along side the albums up to Reverberation. See this thread.

1. Heaven Up Here
2. Ocean Rain
3. Porcupine
4. Crocodiles
5. Echo & the Bunnymen
6. Reverberation

For the same reasons I can't include Glide, Mac solo or Electrafixion. It's like ranking a McCartney solo, Wings or The Firemen album against the White Album or Rubber Soul or whatever. Different times, different people, different lifestyles and all that.
Actually I don't think Reverberation belongs here either but I'll play that far and rank it last since it did have the Bunnymen name on it. That would be like Harrison and Ringo putting out an album in 1971 and calling it The Beatles without Lennon and McCartney in a way.

I suppose you Beatles haters here will hate that comparison but it's the only thing I could think of that everyone would understand my reasoning. Carry on with the rankings (however you want) and please don't let my comments turn this into another Beatles thread!

[fat cherry]

but I'll play that far and rank it last since it did have the Bunnymen name on it. That would be like Harrison and Ringo putting out an album in 1971 and calling it The Beatles without Lennon and McCartney in a way.

i get youre reasoning fine. though I think you could if you wanted to, and anyway youre wrong, it'd be like harrison and mcartney putting out a beatles album without ringo and lennon, or lennon and harrison, or something.

[Dr Cheese]

Did someone mention The Beatles ...