Michael Jackson?

by **Frank The Bunny** » Fri Jun 26, 2009 7:58 pm

shadows on the trees wrote:Thanks, Jack?

I second that...

...now show us your tits!

by **withahip** » Sat Jun 27, 2009 12:32 pm

http://leftovertakeout.com/post/1312485 ... -in-harlem

by **crystal daze** » Sat Jun 27, 2009 4:15 pm

http://www.b3ta.com/challenge/michaeljackson/popular/

by **tonywojo** » Sat Jun 27, 2009 5:04 pm

shadows on the trees wrote:I found out today that "there is something wrong with [me]" because I never liked anything he did. Apparently I'm the only person in the world that didn't like his horrid piping squeaks.

i agree entirely

by **Voodoo Billy** » Sun Jun 28, 2009 4:13 am

shadows on the trees wrote:I found out today that "there is something wrong with [me]" because I never liked anything he did. Apparently I'm the only person in the world that didn't like his horrid piping squeaks.

Was that the noise when they were pumping his chest?

by **happy_loss** » Sun Jun 28, 2009 8:06 am

Ok, the first album I ever bought was Thriller in 3rd grade. Ok, I said it, it's done, it's out in the open. I still find everything from Jackson 5 to Thriller pretty damn good when I hear it, anything past that.........no, except for that wonderful diddy he did with Sir Paul..........

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/5gWvBXS2t4A&hl=en&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/5gWvBXS2t4A&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

by **fat cherry** » Sun Jun 28, 2009 1:15 pm

why do people do this when someone carks it?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/8123085.stm

by **fat cherry** » Sun Jun 28, 2009 2:39 pm

wow, some nanny (the stomach thing i mean, not the squealing thing)
http://www.nme.com/news/michael-jackson/45692

by **withahip** » Tue Jun 30, 2009 8:16 pm

by **withahip** » Tue Jun 30, 2009 9:12 pm

Debbie Rowe may have given birth to Michael Jackson's oldest children, but TMZ is now reporting neither he NOR she are the biological parents. Citing "multiple sources deeply connected to the births," the site claims Michael Jr. and Paris were conceived in vitro, outside the womb, and that Michael was not the sperm donor. Also, Rowe's eggs were not used and she was quite simply a paid surrogate.

by **shadows on the trees** » Tue Jun 30, 2009 9:40 pm

withahip wrote:Debbie Rowe may have given birth to Michael Jackson's oldest children, but TMZ is now reporting neither he NOR she are the biological parents. Citing "multiple sources deeply connected to the births," the site claims Michael Jr. and Paris were conceived in vitro, outside the womb, and that Michael was not the sperm donor. Also, Rowe's eggs were not used and she was quite simply a paid surrogate.

So they picked them up at Petsmart?

by **withahip** » Tue Jun 30, 2009 9:45 pm

shadows on the trees wrote:So they picked them up at Petsmart?

Heh. Actually - those kids are about the only people concerned I have any pity for in all of this.

by **shadows on the trees** » Tue Jun 30, 2009 10:41 pm

Exactly. Poor kids. After the balcony-dangling, this.

Does it ever strike you that some people really shouldn't be allowed to have children? I mean, you have to pass a test to get a driver's license, but any damn fool can reproduce. Bf, for instance...

by **black francis** » Wed Jul 01, 2009 2:30 am

It's not my fault condoms take away from the feel.

by **Frank The Bunny** » Wed Jul 01, 2009 7:31 am

shadows on the trees wrote:any damn fool can reproduce. Bf, for instance...

As far as I know, you can't reproduce the way Bf does it... and with whom he does it.

Yes, that was a homosexual buttsex joke.

Michael Jackson?

Who is online