JackT wrote:FYI, I predicted Palin months ago, and believe it to be, politically, the best possible choice from the field McCain had to work with.
withahip wrote:Wow - we really have an election here.
Ok, listening to McCain and Palin - are the Republicans now pro-union? I don't get it. McCain said she took on the oil companies. Palin said her husband is an oil rig worker in a union. I am confused.
Frank The Bunny wrote:Do you think it's a ticket capable of winning the Presidency?
JackT wrote:Sure, why not? Why wouldn't it?
Frank The Bunny wrote:Well, McCain's already going to have a tough time fighting the "more of the same" argument from the left. Now, he's bringing "change" to the ticket - but the only change she brings is gender.
I'm seeing her NRA card, her fight to have creationism taught in Alaska public schools, and her staunch pro-life stance as three things that will put a wedge between her and moderates.
withahip wrote:I'm a little creeped out about her son going to Iraq. And this surprises me. For so long I was thinking these people don't send their own kids - this one goes and the cynic in me thinks, "They want power that bad they'll send their kid as a symbol?"
Frank The Bunny wrote:I think that's even a little too cynical for me. Her son joined up a year ago. He's just now being deployed to Iraq.
Biden's son is also going - on October 3rd.
JackT wrote:Also, nobody can "send" their kid to Iraq. I guess you could try to demand they go, but I don't know how that would work.
withahip wrote:So does this end like a Prince Harry thing where they will be more of a target and put their group in greater danger?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests