
the ghost of guitarplayer wrote:Odd pic that. What was the photographer wanting Mac to be.
Davros?
black francis wrote:
the ghost of guitarplayer wrote:Sylar - I think he is shortly going to become a "reformed" villain on the current series of Heroes, which my guess, will be the last we get of that series on the BBC as they are not willing to buy any more American shows. After that, my fascination with Hayden Claire bear will have to come to an end.
Kounelaki wrote:That photo was taken by Chris Buck (http://www.chrisbuck.com/), who used to work for Nerve magazine, a Toronto music freebie.
LW: You say that you don't like rock photos that look like rock photos. What is the most “unrock star” photo you've ever shot?
CB: I find the archetypes of rock photography lame; there’s the colorful high-energy shot or the hang out and look "cool" picture. As someone who is an intense and serious popular music fan, I want more. I think that these musicians and what they do is deeply interesting, so their portraits should be, too. And since you asked, I would guess that my least "rock star photo" of a rock star is the portrait of Ian McCulloch of Echo & The Bunnymen. It seems quiet and sad. He doesn’t look like he’s going to be rocking anyone out anytime soon.
http://www.bbgun.org/text/buck.htm
What was the first story or photo you had published in Nerve? Do you feel the story or photo holds up well today?
That Ian McCulloch Eye cover is ironically one of the best Nerve covers that we ever did. It's too bad that that approach--a timely, strong photograph or illustration--didn't become the M.O. for the cover design. Instead, it soon moved, and mostly stayed with, the conventional: "the big story gets the cover." To give Dave and Nancy credit, they often did fun visual things with what they had to work with but as Nerve was an alternative free paper there was little reason not to make the covers as interesting and attractive as possible, the marketplace be damned.
http://rockcriticsarchives.com/features ... -buck.html
Dr Evil wrote:What!!! Not content with plastering IdiotVision logo's over all their digital channels including the supposedly high quality picture of BBC HD (thanks, but i'd rather watch standard definition than have it spoiled with a bug) they get rid of the one show that justified their extortionate licence fee!?
Well in that case I'm not paying and if they fine me they'll still be out of pocket by the time I've burnt broadcasting house down (I consider arson a form of alternative politics) though I might reconsider if they broadcast some of my rock videos.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests